We did a bunch of refactors to ReactFlightClient in PRs like #29823 and #33664.
This brings a bunch of those related refactors to the equivalent FlightReplyServer. Such as deep resolution of cycles and deferred error handling.
`react-stack-bottom-frame` -> `react_stack_bottom_frame`.
This survives `@babel/plugin-transform-function-name`, but now frames
will be displayed as `at Object.react_stack_bottom_frame (...)` in V8.
Checks that were relying on exact function name match were updated to
use either `.indexOf()` or `.includes()`
For backwards compatibility, both React DevTools and Flight Client will
look for both options. I am not so sure about the latter and if React
version is locked.
When we get the source location for "View source for this element" we
should be using the enclosing function of the callsite of the child. So
that we don't just point to some random line within the component.
This is similar to the technique in #33136.
This technique is now really better than the fake throw technique, when
available. So I now favor the owner technique. The only problem it's
only available in DEV and only if it has a child that's owned (and not
filtered).
We could implement this same technique for the error that's thrown in
the fake throwing solution. However, we really shouldn't need that at
all because for client components we should be able to call
`inspect(fn)` at least in Chrome which is even better.
Enables the `enableEagerAlternateStateNodeCleanup` feature flag for all
variants, while maintaining the `__VARIANT__` for the internal React
Native flavor for backtesting reasons.
```
$ yarn test
```
`pull_request_target` gives access to repository secrets and permissions
for use from forks, for example to add a comment.
> Due to the dangers inherent to automatic processing of PRs, GitHub’s
standard pull_request workflow trigger by default prevents write
permissions and secrets access to the target repository. However, in
some scenarios such access is needed to properly process the PR. To this
end the pull_request_target workflow trigger was introduced.
> The reason to introduce the pull_request_target trigger was to enable
workflows to label PRs (e.g. needs review) or to comment on the PR.
(via
https://securitylab.github.com/resources/github-actions-preventing-pwn-requests/)
In this case there is no reason for us to allow this, so let's just use
the normal `pull_request` trigger which is less permissive.
---
[//]: # (BEGIN SAPLING FOOTER)
Stack created with [Sapling](https://sapling-scm.com). Best reviewed
with [ReviewStack](https://reviewstack.dev/facebook/react/pull/32708).
* __->__ #32708
* #32709
Followup from https://github.com/facebook/react/pull/32499
Manual mode is unused and has some bugs such as revealing hidden
boundaries when manually toggling. We also want to change how manual
mode works, and do some refactors to Activity to make it easier to
support. For now we'll remove it, then add it back after the other
changes we have planned.
This works around this Safari bug.
https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=290146
This unfortunate because it may cause additional layouts if there's more
updates to the tree coming by manual mutation before it gets painted
naturally. However, we might end up wanting to read layout early anyway.
This affects the fixture because we clone the `<link>` from the `<head>`
which is itself another bug. However, it should be possible to have
`<link>` tags inserted into the new tree so this is still relevant.
Partially reverts #32686.
PR caches inherit from caches generated in `main`. If it cannot find
that cache, it will create one scoped to just that PR (and PRs that
inherit from it).
There is an edge case where cache eviction can happen in the middle of a
test run. If cache eviction removes a `main` cache, child jobs that
depend on it will start failing because of the `fail-on-cache-miss`
setting.
This PR reverts the default behavior. If this happens, the workflow will
still continue in slow mode where it will `yarn install` child jobs
instead of reusing from cache. This is slower but will at least allow
workflows to continue.
Additionally I added restore keys so that we can fallback to other
caches if present so `yarn install` doesn't need to start over from
scratch.
Updates ~all of our validations to return a Result, and then updates callers to either unwrap() if they should bailout or else just log.
ghstack-source-id: 418b5f5aa2
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/react/pull/32688
React uses function identity to determine whether a given JSX expression represents the same type of component and should reconcile (keep state, update props) or replace (teardown state, create a new instance). This PR adds off-by-default validation to check that developers are not dynamically creating components during render.
The check is local and intentionally conservative. We specifically look for the results of call expressions, new expressions, or function expressions that are then used directly (or aliased) as a JSX tag. This allows common sketchy but fine-in-practice cases like passing a reference to a component from a parent as props, but catches very obvious mistakes such as:
```js
function Example() {
const Component = createComponent();
return <Component />;
}
```
We could expand this to catch more cases, but this seems like a reasonable starting point. Note that I tried enabling the validation by default and the only fixtures that error are the new ones added here. I'll also test this internally. What i'm imagining is that we enable this in the linter but not the compiler.
ghstack-source-id: e7408c0a55
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/react/pull/32683
Since we use a centralized cache we should fail subsequent steps if the
child jobs are unable to restore the cache from the first 2 jobs.
Also fix some incorrect hashes used for the fixture tests.
---
[//]: # (BEGIN SAPLING FOOTER)
Stack created with [Sapling](https://sapling-scm.com). Best reviewed
with [ReviewStack](https://reviewstack.dev/facebook/react/pull/32686).
* __->__ #32686
* #32685
There was a bug previously in our commit artifacts step where the
emitted REVISION hash would reference the commit on the builds branch
rather than from `main`.
Given that our internal manual sync script also does this, let's align
them both to always reference the commit from `main` instead.
---
[//]: # (BEGIN SAPLING FOOTER)
Stack created with [Sapling](https://sapling-scm.com). Best reviewed
with [ReviewStack](https://reviewstack.dev/facebook/react/pull/32680).
* __->__ #32680
* #32679
* #32678
Defaults to warn, but since some steps require these artifacts to be
uploaded we specify an error if its not found. Some other steps like
playwright test-results are only uploaded on failure so it's okay to
ignore.
---
[//]: # (BEGIN SAPLING FOOTER)
Stack created with [Sapling](https://sapling-scm.com). Best reviewed
with [ReviewStack](https://reviewstack.dev/facebook/react/pull/32679).
* #32680
* __->__ #32679
* #32678
> Caches have branch scope restriction in place. This means that if
caches for a specific branch are using a lot of storage quota, it may
result into more frequently used caches from default branch getting
thrashed. For example, if there are many pull requests happening on a
repo and are creating caches, these cannot be used in default branch
scope but will still occupy a lot of space till they get cleaned up by
eviction policy. But sometime we want to clean them up on a faster
cadence so as to ensure default branch is not thrashing.
https://github.com/actions/cache/blob/main/tips-and-workarounds.md#force-deletion-of-caches-overriding-default-cache-eviction-policy
---
[//]: # (BEGIN SAPLING FOOTER)
Stack created with [Sapling](https://sapling-scm.com). Best reviewed
with [ReviewStack](https://reviewstack.dev/facebook/react/pull/32675).
* __->__ #32675
* #32674
To avoid race conditions where multiple jobs try to write to the same
cache, we now centralize saving the cache and then reusing it in every
subsequent job.
---
[//]: # (BEGIN SAPLING FOOTER)
Stack created with [Sapling](https://sapling-scm.com). Best reviewed
with [ReviewStack](https://reviewstack.dev/facebook/react/pull/32672).
* #32675
* #32674
* __->__ #32672
## Summary
In the recommended configuration for `eslint-plugin-react-compiler`,
i.e. `reactCompiler.configs.recommended`, the rule is typed as `string`
rather than `eslint.Linter.RuleEntry` or anything assignable thereto,
which results in the following type error if you type check your eslint
configuration:
```
Property ''react-compiler/react-compiler'' is incompatible with index signature.
Type 'string' is not assignable to type 'RuleEntry | undefined'.
```
Simply adding a const assertion fixes the error.
## How did you test this change?
I emitted declarations for the module and confirmed that the rule is now
typed as the string literal `'error'`
